Ãvaluation critique du régime juridique québécois en matière de consentement aux soins pour le majeur inapte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le regime juridique instaure par le legislateur quebecois en matiere de consentement aux soins pour le majeur inapte merite d'etre revise. La determination de cette inaptitude produit des effets importants. Le constat d'inaptitude prive la personne majeure de son droit de prendre une decision a l'egard de sa sante, une des spheres les plus personnelles et privees de sa vie. Cette these utilise une approche transdisciplinaire, puisant a la fois dans le droit et la bioethique, pour evaluer de facon critique: l'encadrement de la determination de cette inaptitude, la determination juridique de cette inaptitude et les dispositions pertinentes du Code civil du Quebec qui s'appliquent en matiere de consentement aux soins lorsque cette inaptitude est constatee par le medecin. L'auteur conclut que l'objectif vise par le legislateur quebecois, le respect de la personne, n'est que partiellement atteint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".