MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7016009648

Zero-Delay Lossy Coding of Linear Vector Markov Sources with Applications to Networked Control

2021· dissertation· en· W7016009648 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov chainMarkov processEncoderLossy compressionMarkov decision processCoding (social sciences)Optimal controlControl theory (sociology)Markov modelRate of convergence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis we study the optimal zero-delay coding (quantization) of $\\mathbb{R}^d$-valued linearly
\ngenerated Markov sources under quadratic distortion. The structure and existence of
\ndeterministic and stationary coding policies that are optimal for the infinite horizon average
\ncost (distortion) problem is established. Prior results studying the optimality
\nof zero-delay codes for Markov sources for infinite horizons either considered finite
\nalphabet sources or, for the $\\mathbb{R}^d$-valued case, only showed the
\nexistence of deterministic and non-stationary Markov coding policies or those
\nwhich are randomized. In addition to existence results, for finite blocklength
\n(horizon) $T$ the performance of an optimal coding policy is shown to approach
\nthe infinite time horizon optimum at a rate $O(\\frac{1}{T})$. This gives an
\nexplicit rate of convergence that quantifies the near-optimality of finite window (finite-memory)
\ncodes among all optimal zero-delay codes. In addition, we present an important application of our result to closed loop networked control systems. We show that with predictive encoder the separation principle for the infinite horizon problem holds. Prior results only proved this for finite horizon average cost problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207