In vitro characterization of the role of chalcone isomerase-like (CHIL) in flavanone biosynthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analysis of variance ATP Adenosine triphosphate BiFC Bimolecular fluorescence complementation BNY Bisnoryangonin bp Nucleic acid base pairs BSA Bovine serum albumin C4H Cinnamate 4-hydroxylase CHI Chalcone isomerase CHIL Chalcone isomerase-like CHR Chalcone reductase CHS Chalcone synthase CoA Coenzyme-A COR Codeinone reductase CTAL p-Coumaroyltriacetic acid lactone CTAS p-Coumaroyltriacetic acid synthase DDC Duplication, degeneration, and complementation DIMBOA 2,4-Dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoaxazin-3-one DMX Desmethylxanthohumol DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid DSF Differential scanning fluorimetry ECL Enhanced chemiluminescence EFP Enhancer of flavonoid production ER Endoplasmic reticulum FAP Fatty acid-binding protein FNS Flavone synthase HCl Hydrochloric acid HCT Hydroxycinnamoyl transferase hER Human estrogen receptor His Histidine HRP Horseradish peroxidase HSD Honestly significant difference IFS Isoflavone synthase IPTG Isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopryranoside * Phytozome v13.0 (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/)gene identifiers.† Expected molecular weight (kDa), including N-terminal tags.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".