Why aren't you girls serving the groomsmen their cake?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For decades, women from rural communities have been leaving their homes for various reasons, and in the process, have likely been exposed to ideas that challenged their ideas about gender, and gender relations.This study focuses on women like myself who were born and raised in rural Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), and have since moved to more urban spaces.My aim is to find out whether or not other rural women find themselves questioning and challenging the traditional and patriarchal gendered culture of our hometowns and our province.While there is ample existing literature on the construction of gender, and the historical connections between gender roles and rurality, there is little research done on why and how women who grow up in rural communities come to challenge or question patriarchal gender ideologies, and if they experience a difference when they move to urban centers to pursue higher education and/or employment opportunities.Moreover, even less is known about the social consequences of adopting more critical and feminist ideas about gender and rurality.Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the prevalence of traditional gender roles and expectations of women in the province, and how their experiences vary from those of women in more progressive, urban locations.May 1, 2016 RUNNING HEAD: Gender Relations in Rural and Urban Spaces While acknowledging that most Western cultures do share similar gendered patterns in terms of who does the bulk of the work within the home (including childrearing), and who is the breadwinner, this wedding made me recognize the prominent influence that traditional gendered roles and normative expectations have on women within the province.I was raised in a rural logging community in Newfoundland and Labrador, a province where traditional and patriarchal gendered roles play a significant role in the construction of its culture and rich history.I moved to Halifax to attend university where I became educated in areas of feminist theory and the social construction of gender and gendered identities.In doing so, I came to wonder how and why I had abandoned the gendered values that my culture holds so dear.Surely, I am not alone in this struggle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".