MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7016204289

Z-0010 Interview with Vaneetha Risner

2021· other· en· W7016204289 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Digital Collections (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · 2021
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSound Studies and Aurality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristianityFaithChristian faithPoliomyelitisGirlSpirituality
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vaneetha Risner is a Christian author and blogger who writes about “how God meets us” in suffering. Risner was born in Chennai, India, where she was diagnosed with polio as an infant. Her family moved to England and then to Canada when she was a young girl, and she spent a large part of her early childhood in and out of hospitals for complications related to polio. In this interview, Risner describes her family’s reaction to her polio diagnosis, the bullying she experienced as a child with a visible disability, and how she came to be a writer later in life. Risner recounts how she came to Christianity in high school, and how her faith guided her through difficulties in her early adulthood, including the death of her infant son. Risner also speaks about being diagnosed with post-polio syndrome as an adult, divorcing her first husband, and remarrying. Risner discusses her first book, The Scars That Have Shaped Me: How God Meets Us in Suffering, which is based on her previous blog posts with the Christian site Desiring God. She recounts the positive and negative feedback she’s received on her writing, what she’s learned from her experience with polio, and her favorite Bible verse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Digital Collections (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)Same topicSound Studies and AuralityFrench-language works237,207