Welland Ship Canal Photo Album, 1922-1933, n.d.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An album containing photos of the construction of the Welland Ship Canal. \nThere are 137 black and white photographs dated from 1922 to 1933. Many \nof the photos have captions. Photos include excavation of the guard gate site; \nview of guard gate structure; excavation of Ontario Paper Co. dock; mudslide \nat the Ontario Paper Co. dock site; west end safety weir in present canal; \nunwatering dams and sluice on site safety weir; cut connecting entrce. Lock 7 \nto present canal prism; excavating rock in prism and turning basin; channel \nexcavation; guard and east end safety weir; canal prism looking south from \nguard gate; canal prism looking north from guard gate; Thorold turning basin; \nremains of cofferdam, safety weir; supply channel from west end safety weir; \nupstream side safety weir; dredging safety weir; downbound vessels awaiting \nopening canal at guard gate; guard gate with bridge no. 8 open; guard gate \nwith bridge no. 10 closed; wire rope fender and machinery above guard gate; \nThorold at Ontario Paper Co. dock; Beaver Dams culvert; Beaver Dams \ncreek; G.T.R. culvert and embankment; bridge no. 10; trench for Davis \nculvert; Thorold-Allanburg bridge over Beaver Dams Creek; canal prism; \nbridge no. 11; bridge no. 12; syphon culvert site; aqueduct; rock blasting at \nRamey’s bend; Wabash crossing; bridge no. 14; bridge no. 16; bridge no. 18; \ncasting concrete piles for Welland dock; Derrick Scow “Handy Andy”; and \nthe Administration Building. In one photograph a horse is used to help haul heavy materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".