Ãvolution et consolidation de l'espace francophone du Grand Moncton au Nouveau-Brunswick : 1960-2002
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’évolution de l’espace francophone du Grand Moncton au Nouveau-Brunswick, est, depuis 1960, le fruit de nombreuses luttes menées par les francophones aux niveaux culturel, politique, économique, social et linguistique. Ces luttes ont notamment permis l’ajout de postulats fondamentaux nécessaires au développement de la communauté de langue française et ont contribué à la diversification et l’enrichissement des espaces vécu et institutionnel ainsi que des liens supra régionaux de la communauté. Ces différents éléments ont directement influencé la zone d’influence francophone en milieu urbain qui, durant cette période, a pris de l’expansion. Malgré son développement constant depuis 1960, de nombreux défis attendent la communauté francophone du Grand Moncton toujours aux prises avec des taux d’assimilation élevés et l’absence de loi protégeant la langue d’affichage et de travail. La récente ouverture d’esprit de la communauté anglophone permettra néanmoins de relever ces défis dans un environnement plus favorable que celui des années 1960.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".