MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7016415954

Wind tunnel study on the wake bubble of model trucks

2008· dissertation· en· W7016415954 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWakeTruckWind tunnelTraffic volumeBubbleSupersonic wind tunnelFlow (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heavy traffic volume makes tailgating a common picture on the road today. Wake interference, particularly in the scenario when a relatively small sedan drives into the wake of a large truck, may raise some serious highway safety concerns. In this study, the characteristics of separation bubble in the wake of model trucks with various degrees of model details are studied. The objective is to uncover the impact of truck model details on the characteristics of the wake bubble. Furthermore, how the spacing between the leading sedan and truck affects the bubble is also investigated. The hotwire measurements as well as flow visualization using a tuft grid have been conducted in a closed-loop wind tunnel at Re=2–7×105. The wind tunnel results revealed that both the degree of model details and the spacing between sedan and truck have significant impact on the three dimensional structure of the wake bubble.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)Same topicAerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics ResearchFrench-language works237,207