An Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search heuristic for last-mile deliveries under stochastic customer availability and multiple visits
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Attended Home Delivery, where customer attendance at home is required, is an essential last-mile delivery challenge, e.g., for valuable, perishable, or oversized items. Logistics service providers are often faced no-show customers. In this paper, we consider the delivery problem in which customers can be revisited on the same day by a courier in the case of a failed first delivery attempt. Specifically, customer presence uncertainty is considered in a two-stage stochastic program, where penalties are introduced as recourse actions for failed deliveries. We build on the notion of a customer availability profile defined as a profile containing historical time-varying probability information of successful deliveries. We tackle this stochastic program by developing an efficient parallelized Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search algorithm. Our results show that by achieving a right balance between increasing the hit rate and reducing travel cost, logistics service providers can realize costs savings as high as 32% if they plan for second visits on the same day.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it