Análise do desempenho do PIB dos estados nordestinos e sua relação com as transferências federais e receitas próprias
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The economic dependence of the northeastern states of the resources of the central entity in the Federal Republic of Brazil still dominates the economic situation of the public sector today. However, with more aggressive policies in respect to the economy, especially during 1990 and 2000 shows that gradually, own resources, derived from the collection of taxes, provide a less dependence on constitutional transfers to these states. This situation can be proven observers described the increase own revenues of the past years. Based on this assumption that the objective is to study the present relationship of the independent constitutional transfers and own revenues with the dependent variable growth rate of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for the nine states of the federation located in northeastern Brazil from 1988 to 2008. The methodology for this test is used as a mechanism econometric model, and a literature review. From the roll of the dice was taken as a result of a relationship with a positive sign and statistical significance of the variable "own revenue" with the phenomenon studied. Another important conclusion is that the predictor variable "constitutional transfers", despite a positive sign, did not represent statistical significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".