The abandonment of the South Bay waste management area.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The South Bay copper/zinc concentrator was located in the Red Lake district of Northern Ontario, and was closed in 1981.In an area of 25 hectares, 760,000 tonnes of tailings, which are composed of 41% pyrite and 4.1% pyrrhotite, are contained within low dams.The 75 hectare mine site is surrounded by recreational fishing lakes of the English river drainage system.Decommissioning procedures for the site have been developed which will, in the long term, ensure that the quality of the water leaving the waste management area is environmentally acceptable.Ecological Engineering methods provide a means to ameliorate the effects of acid mine drainage originating from the wastes on the site.In the long term, the Ecological Engineering systems implemented will be self-sustaining and maintenance free.The Ecological Engineering methods being developed are based on the results of studies carried out on the natural recovery process which takes place on abandoned tailings sites (Kalin, 1983;Kalin, 1984;Cairns, 1980), the principles of which have been presentedin detail by Kalin and van Everdingen (1988) and by Mitch and Jorgensen (1989).The metal and sulphate removal capacity of the system depends on the growth rates of the biological agents causing LIST OF TABLES 6 7 8 9 1 OA 10B 1oc 11 12 Drainage areas for tailings, Boomerang Lake and Mud Lake basin ..............
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".