Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper attempts to study the roots of the alienation that currently exists in society. Alienation for this paper refers to the rift that exists between humans as we currently are and the potential that we can reach. This paper will attempt to trace the roots of alienation to the origins of the capitalist mode of production. In this, it will first deal with the "transition debate" and posit an understanding of the transition as something that brought about a drastic and qualitative change in social relations and the ways in which people reproduce themselves. It will attempt to denaturalize capitalist relations in order to truly trace the origins of the logic of capital. The paper will then delve into human nature. It will put forth a notion of human nature that is social and productive in order to understand some of the ways that capitalist production relations have fettered the growth of human nature. Finally, the paper will deal with alienation. It will trace the roots of alienation in some of the foundational tenets of the capitalist mode of production and discuss ways in which this alienation manifests itself. This paper ends with noting that alienation is inherent within capitalism and that in order for humans to achieve the same potential that capitalist production also generates, capitalism itself will have to be replaced with an alternate mode of production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".