MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017190627

Alusuisse in West Africa. A Case Study of Swiss Imperialism: Bauxite Mining in Sierra Leone (1960-1992) and Guinea (1970-1978)

2023· other· en· W7017190627 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBauxite Residue and Utilization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsSierra leoneBauxiteProfitability indexGovernment (linguistics)MonopolyState (computer science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Is Switzerland an imperialist country? The historiographical debate surrounding Swiss imperialism has centred on the character of Swiss private economic engagement in the Third World and its interplay with the Swiss federal state. The Swiss firm Alusuisse was one of the most powerful players in the international aluminium market in the 20th century. Alusuisse engaged in bauxite mining in Guinea and Sierra Leone from the 1960s onwards. This thesis examines whether Alusuisse’s actions in West Africa between 1960 and 1992 were imperialistic and whether the company collaborated with the Swiss state to achieve its aims. Two Alusuisse bauxite mining subsidiaries are investigated using the framework of investment imperialism: SIEROMCO in Sierra Leone (1960-1991) and SOMIGA in Guinea (1970-1978). A particular focus was laid on the country-company negotiations with the host governments. Based on the company’s historical records contained in the Swiss economic archive, the thesis asserts that Alusuisse’s activities in West Africa were a case of investment imperialism. In Sierra Leone, the government granted the Swiss company a monopoly on bauxite mining. For three decades, Alusuisse extracted cheap, highquality bauxite while obscuring the profitability of its subsidiary SIEROMCO to avoid paying taxes. In Guinea, Alusuisse negotiated favourable contract conditions for bauxite mining but failed to realise their original aims due to turbulence in the global aluminium market in the 1970s. Whenever conflicts between Alusuisse and the governments of Sierra Leone and Guinea arose, the company managed to impose its priorities. This was possible due to Alusuisse’s economic power, derived from its control over capital, technical expertise, and the aluminium production process. The Swiss federal state only played a marginal role in Alusuisse’s success in West Africa. Therefore, the case of Alusuisse in West Africa supports the characterisation of Swiss imperialism as predominantly driven by private enterprises.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it