Adaptação cultural, validade e confiabilidade do Inventário de Habilidades de Vida Independente – versão do paciente (ILSS-BR/P) com portadores de esquizofrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: There is a strong association between good psychosocial functioning and the ability to carry out everyday tasks in patients with schizophrenia. Valid Instruments become increasingly necessary to evaluate the performance of these patients on independent living activities. Objective: The aim of this study was to adapt and assess the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Independent Living Skills Survey (ILSS-BR/P) with schizophrenic patients. Method: The study was conducted with three different samples drawn from community mental health services in the city of Sao Paulo. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled in interrater study, with 64.4% agreement between the responses and a range of 0.80-0.99 of the Intraclass Correlation (ICC). Forty-six patients participated in the test-retest, ICC ranged from 0.84-0.94, with 44.3% agreement. There was a good internal consistency. One hundred and sixty patients participated in the validation. In the discriminant validity, female patients presented a higher performance in overall score and five subscales compared with men. The concurrent validity confirmed the specificity of the dimensions of scale, comparing the ILSS with the PANSS, Calgary, CGI, GAF, WHOQOL and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem. Discussion: ILSS-BR/P is a valid and reliable research instrument to assess social functioning of this sample.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".