Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueVTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · 2016
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilGoddard Space Flight CenterUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationEgerton UniversityPunjab Agricultural UniversityPakistan Agricultural Research CouncilInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de MonterreyMinistry of EnvironmentInstituto Nacional de Investigaciones AgropecuariasIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchSouth African Medical Research CouncilNepal Agricultural Research CouncilNorth Carolina Pork CouncilSoutheast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in AgricultureOregon State UniversityCenter for Strategic ResearchWashington State UniversityUniversity of OklahomaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationPurdue UniversityInternational Fine Particle Research InstituteNational Research CentreInstituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y PecuariasMekelle UniversityU.S. Department of AgricultureUniversity of ConnecticutUniversity of California, Los AngelesInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaInternational Livestock Research InstituteUniversity of PittsburghVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaMinistry of Education, KenyaNorth Carolina State UniversityTexas Tech UniversityOhio State UniversityWilliams CollegeMcMaster UniversityYale UniversityLa Trobe UniversityUtah State UniversitySouth Dakota State University
KeywordsAgricultureGovernment (linguistics)
DOInot available
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexNo abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
