Archives and Justice: Willard Irelandâs Contribution to the Changing Legal Framework of Aboriginal Rights in Canada, 1963â1973
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malgré leur rôle essentiel dans l'acquisition, le classement, la préservation et la diffusion de documents culturels et légaux importants, les contributions des archivistes canadiens en matière de droits humains et de justice sociale au Canada et dans le monde ont souvent été négligées.Pourtant, ces contributions ont influencé le discours public et légal par rapport aux questions telles les droits des Autochtones et elles ont résonné dans les décisions judiciaires qui sont aujourd'hui à la base de notre connaissance de ces questions.Étant donné leur accès à une information plus poussée du contexte historique et de l'histoire des documents d'archives, les archivistes apportent souvent des perspectives uniques; cependant, on prend souvent pour acquis cet accès au contexte et à l'histoire.La vie et la carrière de Willard Ernest Ireland (1914-1979), archiviste provincial de la Colombie-Britannique de 1940 à 1974, illustre bien cet oubli.On a peu écrit au sujet d'Ireland et de l'influence de sa carrière, non seulement sur la préservation de l'histoire, mais aussi sur la création même de celle-ci.Ce texte examinera les contributions clés de Ireland à deux causes judiciaires, Regina v. White and Bob et Calder v.The Attorney General of British Columbia, causes critiques pour l'établissement d'un fondement légal pour les droits des Autochtones au Canada.ABSTRACT Despite their pivotal roles in collecting, organizing, preserving, and disseminating important cultural and legal records, the contributions of Canadian archivists to the pursuit of human rights and social justice in Canada and the world ARChIvARIA 71 (Spring 2011): 35-62
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.039 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".