Archives and Justice: Willard Irelandâs Contribution to the Changing Legal Framework of Aboriginal Rights in Canada, 1963â1973
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Malgr leur rle essentiel dans l'acquisition, le classement, la prservation et la diffusion de documents culturels et lgaux importants, les contributions des archivistes canadiens en matire de droits humains et de justice sociale au Canada et dans le monde ont souvent t ngliges.Pourtant, ces contributions ont influenc le discours public et lgal par rapport aux questions telles les droits des Autochtones et elles ont rsonn dans les dcisions judiciaires qui sont aujourd'hui la base de notre connaissance de ces questions.tant donn leur accs une information plus pousse du contexte historique et de l'histoire des documents d'archives, les archivistes apportent souvent des perspectives uniques; cependant, on prend souvent pour acquis cet accs au contexte et l'histoire.La vie et la carrire de Willard Ernest Ireland (1914-1979), archiviste provincial de la Colombie-Britannique de 1940 1974, illustre bien cet oubli.On a peu crit au sujet d'Ireland et de l'influence de sa carrire, non seulement sur la prservation de l'histoire, mais aussi sur la cration mme de celle-ci.Ce texte examinera les contributions cls de Ireland deux causes judiciaires, Regina v. White and Bob et Calder v.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".