MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7017387384

Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis in Canada

2011· dissertation· en· W7017387384 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Atrium (University of Guelph) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNovalaitPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of CanadaDairy Farmers of Canada
KeywordsMastitisStaphylococcus aureusVirulenceAntibiotic resistanceCephalosporinEscherichia coliAntimicrobialBacteria
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study characterized the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes present in a collection of 'Escherichia coli, Klebsiella' spp., and ' Staphylococcus aureus' isolates from bovine mastitis cases in Canada. Ampicillin-resistant 'E. coli' isolates along with second-generation cephalosporin resistant 'Klebsiella' spp., any MRSA, and a collection of penicillin-resistant 'S. aureus' isolates were screened for the presence of AMR genes and, in the case of 'S. aureus ', also virulence genes. A high diversity of [beta]-lactamase genes was detected in 'E. coli' and 'Klebsiella' spp. mastitis isolates in comparison to those found in beef cattle fecal isolates by other researchers, and the ubiquitous 'bla'CMY-2 gene was found in bacteria from mastitis. The [beta]-lactam-resistant ' S. aureus' isolates contained many 'blaZ' gene variants. The first MRSA isolate from bovine mastitis in Canada was identified as ST8, a sequence type normally associated with humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Atrium (University of Guelph)→Same topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows→French-language works237,207→