MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017445835

Assessing the Leaf Blade Nutrient Status of Pinot Noir Using Hyperspectral Reflectance and Machine Learning Models

2023· article· en· W7017445835 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMassey Research Online (Massey University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingBlade (archaeology)NutrientPattern recognition (psychology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monitoring grape nutrient status, from flowering to veraison, is important for viticulturists when implementing vineyard management strategies, in order to produce quality wines.However, traditional methods for measuring nutrient elements incur high labour costs.The aim of this study is to explore the potential of predicting grapevine leaf blade nutrient concentration based on hyperspectral data.Leaf blades were collected at two Pinot Noir commercial vineyards at Martinborough, New Zealand.The leaf blade spectral data were obtained with a handheld spectroradiometer, to evaluate surface reflectance and derivative spectra in the spectrum range between 400 and 2400 nm.Afterwards, leaf blades nutrient concentrations (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) were measured, and their relationships with the hyperspectral data were modelled by machine learning models; partial least squares regression (PLSR), random forest regression (RFR), and support vector regression (SVR) were used.Pearson correlation and recursive feature elimination, based on cross-validation, were used as feature selection methods for RFR and SVR, to improve the model's performance.The variable importance score of PLSR, and permutation variable importance of RFR and SVR, were used to determine the most sensitive wavelengths, or spectral regions related to each biochemical variable.The results showed that the best predictive performance for leaf blade N concentration was based on PLSR to raw reflectance data (R 2 = 0.66; RMSE = 0.15%).The combination of support vector regression with the Pearson correlation selected method and second derivative reflectance provided a high accuracy for K and Ca modelling (R 2 = 0.7; RMSE = 0.06%; R 2 = 0.62; RMSE = 0.11%, respectively).However, the modelling performance for P and Mg, by different feature groups and variable selection methods, was poor (R 2 = 0.15; RMSE = 0.02%; R 2 = 0.43; RMSE = 0.43%, respectively).Thus, a larger dataset is needed for improving the prediction of P and Mg.The results indicated that for Pinot Noir leaf blades, raw reflectance data had potential for the prediction of N concentration, while the second-derivative spectra were more suitable to predict K and Ca.This study led to the provision of rapid and non-destructive measurements of grapevine leaf nutrient status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.210
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueMassey Research Online (Massey University)Same topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207