MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017450648

Anne Chick: Introduction to the International Joint Commission

2012· other· en· W7017450648 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew) · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNuclear Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlood mythCommissionResilience (materials science)SummitFlooding (psychology)Joint (building)ShoreGovernor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anne Chick, Senior Advisor, International Joint Commission - "Who the IJC is and What They Hope to Accomplish Under Their Newest Charge on Lake Champlain" THE 2012 LAKE CHAMPLAIN FLOOD RESILIENCE CONFERENCE The historic floods of 2011 that brought tragic losses to many communities also put issues such as water quality, shoreline stabilization, and climate change into sharp focus in the region and across the globe. In August 2011, Québec Premier Jean Charest and Vermont Governor Peter Shumlin announced a conference aimed at exploring the Lake Champlain and upper Richelieu River flooding and a multi-jurisdictional response. The Lake Champlain Basin Program was asked to collaborate with the three jurisdictions in convening this conference. Local, state, provincial officials, legislators, federal partners, NGOs, and members of the public participated. This culminating summit summarily reviewed the 2011 flood impacts and then examined in more detail steps needed to improve flood resilience in the watershed. Participants explored potential policy recommendations, and considered public education and awareness efforts, to improve flood resilience in the Lake Champlain and upper Richelieu Basins. Convened by the Lake Champlain Basin Program http://www.lcbp.org

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1460.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)Same topicNuclear Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207