MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017472850

Apostilla al artículo de Lindsay Ayling sobre las jornadas de junio de 1848

2021· article· es· W7017472850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClass (philosophy)SPARK (programming language)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En un interesante artículo, titulado "Choosing June: Did France's Second Republic Intentionally Spark a Class War?", Lindsay Ayling afirma que los dirigentes de la Segunda República Francesa provocaron deliberadamente las sangrientas jornadas de junio de 1848. Defiende esta tesis de forma clara y amena, apoyándola además en un consistente corpus bibliográfico. Sin embargo, hay tres frases a lo largo del texto que, a mi juicio, resultan poco precisas, y que pueden llevar a confusión al lector. Espero que el comentario que sigue de las mismas no sea visto como la apostilla de un puntilloso, sino como una contribución al debate sobre una época y unos acontecimientos apasionantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.830
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona)Same topicEuropean Political History AnalysisFrench-language works237,207