MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7017490974

Base de données sur les études de cas en innovation sociale produites dans le cadre des activités du CRISES. Présentation générale et manuel de codification

2016· report· fr· W7017490974 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal) · 2016
Typereport
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Social impactKnowledge productionIdentity (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce cahier vise à présenter les travaux qui ont été réalisés afin de conceptualiser et d’implanter la Base de données sur l’innovation sociale (BDIS) mise en place par le Centre de recherche sur les innovations sociales (CRISES). Le document détaille le contexte de production de la BDIS, l’approche de l’innovation sociale (IS) adoptée et la littérature consultée en appui au modèle conceptuel, la méthode employée pour la sélection et la définition des entités, attributs et catégories, l’utilité du modèle conceptuel pour l’étude de l’IS et la présentation du modèle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.090
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.090
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0200.029
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0160.015
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)→French-language works237,207→