MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017515852

Benchmarking: Wo stehen Sie mit Ihrem Angebot produktbegleitender Dienstleistungen gegenüber vergleichbaren Industriefirmen?

2002· article· de· W7017515852 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePublikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) · 2002
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)Quarter (Canadian coin)Work (physics)German
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Für viele deutsche Industriefirmen reicht es künftig nicht mehr aus, sich nur über Qualität und Technologiegehalt der Produkte von der Konkurrenz insbesondere aus den Billig-Lohn-Ländern abzuheben. Da diese Wettbewerber in diesen traditionell eine Überlegenheit deutscher Firmen begründeten Kriterien aufgeholt haben, ist nach additiven Differenzierungsmerkmalen zu suchen. Das Angebot kompletter Problemlösungen unter Einschluß eines breiten Spektrums produktbegleitenden Dienstleistungen könnte geeignet sein, auch künftig den Wettbewerbsvorteil abzusichern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.574
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.012
Open science0.0060.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it