MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017523828

2011 Bar Harbor Maine Annual Town Report

2011· article· en· W7017523828 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman auditory perception and evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMaine Department of Transportation
KeywordsDoorsBar (unit)Quarter (Canadian coin)Table (database)Report card
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This year Bar Harbor Fire Department celebrated the 100 th year anniversary of the current fire station.The station is just one of many buildings in Bar Harbor and on the Island that local architect, Fred L. Savage, created.The Four bay station held fire carts that were pulled by horses.The 1911 annual town report indicated there were four firemen listed as engineer, driver hose cart, driver hook and ladder, in addition to the fire chief who also served at the engine house.In 1911, the station was built with a tower.The tower's first floor was used to hang the fire hoses to dry, and the second floor was living quarters for then Fire Chief Roy Hamor and his wife.The tower was removed due to deterioration in the early 1950's.Today, the building's structure remains sound with much of the original building and finishes still existing and Dedication of the Bar Harbor Fire Stationwell maintained.There are pieces of original operating equipment that remain in working order and are used or displayed on special occasions, such as one of the fire pull carts.The original plumbing in the bathroom was replaced this year.The station currently houses

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3650.247

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)Same topicHuman auditory perception and evaluationFrench-language works237,207