A Biological Investigation of the Proteins Required for Nickel Insertion into Escherichia coli [NiFe] Hydrogenase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[NiFe] hydrogenases are found in a variety of microorganisms and catalyze the reversible oxidation of hydrogen gas to protons and electrons. This enzyme has generated intense interest due to its contribution to pathogenicity in certain organisms as well as its application in bioremediation and the production of hydrogen as an alternative fuel source. \nThe biosynthesis of the dinuclear active site requires a number of accessory proteins to chaperone and insert the metal cofactors to the awaiting large subunit of hydrogenase. The proteins responsible for nickel delivery to Escherichia coli hydrogenase 3 are HypA, HypB, and SlyD, however the mechanism by which this is accomplished is unclear. The goal of this work was to analyze the metal-binding abilities and protein interactions of these nickel insertion proteins to enhance our understanding of their roles. \nIsolated N-terminal peptide of HypB has similar high-affinity metal-binding to the full-length protein. This peptide binds nickel in a square planar site with three cysteinyl and a fourth N-terminal amine ligand. Additionally, studies with SlyD and HypA reveal protein interactions that occur during hydrogenase maturation. Pull-down experiments of a tagged variant of hydrogenase revealed multi-protein complexes with HypA, HypB, and SlyD. A complex between SlyD and hydrogenase forms prior to both nickel and iron insertion, supporting chaperone activity of SlyD during hydrogenase maturation. HypA can interact with hydrogenase in the absence of HypB and SlyD, and a possible role as the bridging protein during the nickel insertion event is proposed. In addition, fluorescent imaging of E. coli cells using a fluorescently labeled streptavidin conjugate revealed localization of both Strep-tagged II hydrogenase and HypA at or near the cell membrane, suggesting that enzyme maturation occurs proximal to metal transporters.\nThis work provided a deeper understanding of the role that each of these proteins play in [NiFe] hydrogenase assembly and is helpful for any future applications of this enzyme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".