MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7017565811

The association between maternal distress and serum cortisol levels in children : differential outcomes by asthma diagnosis

2008· dissertation· en· W7017565811 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsthmaStressorDistressHydrocortisoneGlucocorticoidAssociation (psychology)El Niño
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Both asthma and exposure to maternal distress have been shown to correlate with altered cortisol levels in children, but my investigation of the relationship among all three variables appears to be a first.Using a representative sample (n: 503) of the 1995 Manitoba birth cohort, children's serum cortisol levels were examined in relationship to exposure to maternal distress and asthma status.A multiple linear regression analysis confirmed my hypothesis of a statistically significant interaction between childhood asthma and exposure to maternal distress in relation to children's seÍum cortisol levels.As predicted, non-asthmatic children exposed to recurrent maternal distress responded to an acute stressor with elevated cortisol levels whereas children with asthma responded with blunted cortisol levels.My results reinforce the need for mandatory postnatal screening of new mothers through programs such as Manitoba's Families First, which help at risk families in caring for their newborns and may prevent the dysregulation of children's stress response systems as well as conditions such as childhood asthma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicAsthma and respiratory diseases→French-language works237,207→