MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017608194

Before MMIW: Native American Women’s Resistance to Systemic Violence in the Twentieth Century

2024· other· en· W7017608194 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access Journals at BC (Boston College) · 2024
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRacializationGrassrootsIndigenousColonialismPower (physics)Resistance (ecology)White (mutation)IdeologyRacismNative american
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women (MMIW) crisis represents one of the most urgent issues of racialized violence in modern-day Canada and the United States. While this crisis gained significant attention through grassroots activism and promotion in the early 1990s, historians have traced its roots to the enforced racialization of Native Americans through structural and legislative means that are rooted in the remnants of colonial power structures. Scholars have argued that while the racial ideologies used to marginalize Native Americans have transformed throughout history, violence has remained a constant threat that has been overlooked and/or ignored by law enforcement in Canada and the United States. This issue disproportionately affects women, who face significantly higher risks of domestic and sexual violence, as well as brutality from law enforcement. In order to understand the emergence of the MMIW movement in the 1990s, it is imperative to understand the historical lineage of the movement. Throughout the twentieth century, Native American women became more politically-engaged and thus more aware of the structural issues they faced. They also gained new levels of social mobility away from spheres of domestic and tribal patriarchy, a residual effect of colonial ideologies. In effect, Native American women became better positioned to organize around interrelated issues of sexism, education, and domestic/sexual violence. Early platforms advocating for native women’s issues ranged from the American Indian Movement (AIM), established in 1968 to address systemic issues, to women’s shelters, like the White Buffalo Calf Women's Society established in South Dakota in 1980. Drawing from historical examples like these, this paper will consider the organizations, movements, and activists that preceded the grassroots MMIW movement. As MMIW has become a federal initiative in the twenty-first century, an inquiry into its origins contains historical and contemporary significance. Further, much of the existing historical scholarship on this topic focuses on the MMIW crisis in Canada. This paper will specifically approach this subject matter through an analysis of the social, cultural, and political institutions existing in the United States throughout the twentieth century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.286

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.404
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Access Journals at BC (Boston College)Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207