ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR \nYANG MEMPENGARUHI INFLASI \nDI INDONESIA PERIODE 2000.1 â 2011.4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the problems that often occur in developing countries in implementing the country's development is how to maintain stability and economic growth. Economic stability in terms of stability regarding the price level, the level of national income and employment growth. The main objective of this study was to analyze the factors affecting inflation in Indonesia in 2000.1-2011.4 period. The variables used are: gross domestic product (GDP), the money supply in a broad sense (M2), interest rate, Bank Indonesia certificates (SBI), and the exchange rate of rupiah against the U.S. dollar. \nThe data used in this study is time series data in the quarterly period from 2000.1 to 2011.4, using multiple linear regression with the method of Ordinary Least Square (OLS). \nThe results of this analysis states that the variable gross domestic product and the SBI rate are positive and significant effect on inflation. While exchange rate are positive and not significant effect on inflation. In the other hand, the variables in the money supply (M2) is negative and significant effect on inflation in the quarter a year of research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".