MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017652366

Career Self-determination Theory and the Professional Immigrant Experience

2021· dissertation· W7017652366 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCareer Development and Diversity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of International Science and EngineeringUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMetatheoryVocational educationImmigrationCareer developmentGrounded theoryFace (sociological concept)Qualitative research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite established international academic credentials and vocational experience, professional immigrants often face difficulty establishing careers in Canada. Immigration entails a myriad of psychological and financial stressors, including under- and unemployment. Career self-determination theory (CSDT) is an emerging metatheory that proposes considerations to enhance career development and vocational wellbeing. The purpose of the study is to develop a better understanding of the lived career experiences of professional immigrants to Canada while contributing to the development of CSDT. This exploration utilizes constructivist grounded theory in analyzing qualitative interviews with professional immigrants. Results reveal that the essential needs posed by CSDT, including career autonomy, career competence, and career relatedness, are reflected in the participant narratives. Participants demonstrated innate tendencies towards fulfillment of the essential needs, with fulfillment corresponding to greater vocational satisfaction. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.013
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicCareer Development and DiversityFrench-language works237,207