MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7017678178

Breast cancer risk associated with phosphate toxicity

2024· dissertation· en· W7017678178 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsPhosphateBreast cancerToxicityBone mineralCancerCarcinogenesisParathyroid hormone
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background - The essential dietary mineral phosphorus in the form of inorganic phosphate (PO43-) is regulated in the blood serum by a sensitive network of endocrine hormones released from bone, kidneys, parathyroid glands, and intestines. Western dietary patterns are high in phosphorus-rich foods, including dairy, meats, grain products, and foods processed with phosphate additives. Consequently, average phosphate intake is far above the U.S. dietary reference intake of 700 mg for adults. Phosphate toxicity, the accumulation of excess inorganic phosphate throughout the body from dysregulated phosphate metabolism, is associated with tumorigenesis as high levels of inorganic phosphate within the tumor microenvironment stimulate cell signaling pathways and promote cancer cell proliferation. Breast cancer in women is projected to increase to 3-million new cases globally by 2040, yet much of the public remains unaware that breast cancer is associated with alcohol consumption, and phosphate toxicity may play a mediating role in the association of alcohol with breast cancer. Phosphate toxicity is also associated with osteolytic loss of bone mineral density and abnormal osteoblastic bone mineral deposition. \n \nMethods - This thesis presents three studies investigating the association of phosphate toxicity with risk of breast cancer in women related to alcohol consumption, high dietary phosphate intake, and disorders of spinal bone mineral density. A grounded theory literature-review method was used in the first study to retrieve research findings from the literature on alcohol, kidney function, phosphate metabolism, rhabdomyolysis, and breast cancer. Findings were compared and categorized into concepts and themes and were synthesized into a theory positing a mechanism by which the association of breast cancer with alcohol consumption is mediated by phosphate toxicity. \nThe second study used a nested case-control design to measure the relative risk of breast cancer incidence associated with dietary phosphate intake levels in a cohort of middle-aged women from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. The lowest level of 800 to 1000 mg phosphorus per day, based on recommendations from the United States National Kidney Foundation, was used as the reference level to calculate the relative risk of breast cancer in the higher levels of phosphorus intake. \nThe third study used a mixed-methods grounded theory design to synthesize a theory relating phosphate toxicity with breast cancer and spinal bone mineral disorders. Based on the theory, the study used a mixed-effects model to test the hypothesis that changes in spinal bone mineral density are associated with incidence of breast cancer in women from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. \n \nResults - Results of the first study found that alcohol burdens renal function, which can impair the regulation of inorganic phosphate, reduce excretion of excess serum phosphate, and increase phosphate toxicity, a potential mediating factor in breast cancer risk. Alcohol can also cause nontraumatic rhabdomyolysis which ruptures cell membranes and releases inorganic phosphate, contributing to hyperphosphatemia (blood serum phosphate levels above 4.5 mg/dL) with increased breast cancer risk. Furthermore, phosphate toxicity potentially mediates the risk of cancer associated with kidney disease in the medical specialty of onco-nephrology. \nIn the second study, the highest daily intake of dietary phosphorus in the cohort from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation, >1800 mg, is approximately equivalent to menus promoted by the United States Department of Agriculture. This level of dietary phosphorus was associated with a 2.3-fold increase in the risk of breast cancer incidence compared to the reference level of 800 to 1000 mg (RR: 2.30, 95% CI: 0.94–5.61, p = 0.07). The study’s clinically significant effect size, specificity, biological gradient, and other findings meet Bradford Hill’s criteria for causative inference from epidemiological associations. Randomized trials are warranted to test epidemiological associations of dietary components with reduced risk of cancer, as recommended by the National Cancer Institute \nThe analysis of findings from the reviewed literature in the third study confirmed an association of phosphate toxicity with bone mineral disorders and tumorigenesis. In the follow-up study to test the hypothesis that bone mineral disorders are associated with tumorigenesis, women in the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation who self-reported breast cancer were found to have higher bone mineral density at baseline. But these women also had more rapid losses in bone mineral density during follow-up visits compared to women in the control group who remained cancer free. These findings are consistent with osteolytic and osteoblastic bone mineral changes associated with breast cancer. \n \nConclusions - Thesis findings provide the rationale for further clinical studies to test dietary phosphate as a modifiable cause of breast cancer and bone mineral disorders. The effect of alcohol associated with phosphate toxicity can also be disseminated to the public to increase awareness of the risk of breast cancer associated with alcohol consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Same topicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→