Bíblia e cinema: estrutura de narrativas bíblicas de chamado e comissionamento em Os Irmãos Cara de Pau, de John Landis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article intends to use what Canadian literary critic Northrop Frye stated regarding the Bible as “the great code” of art to propose an interpretation of John Landis’s movie The Blues Brothers (1980). The basic presssuposition of this article is that Landis’s movie follows the basic structure of three biblical stories (Exodus 3.1-10, Isaiah 6.1-8 and Acts of the Apostles 9.1-15) in which there is a manifestation of the holy, followed by a calling for a mission. The article presents some remarks about the relationship between movies and Bible, followed by a presentation of the movie itself. After this some considerations about three biblical stories of calling and vocation are presented, as we understand these stories provide the narrative thread followed by the movie. As a theoretical basis the article used mainly Roger Bastide’s idea of holy wild and the unspeakable element in the idea of the holy according to Rudolf Otto.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".