MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017740096

Belonging and membership. Postcolonial legacies of colonial family law in Dutch immigration policies

2013· book-chapter· en· W7017740096 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) · 2013
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicGerman Colonialism and Identity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNordForskUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsScholarshipImmigrationCohesion (chemistry)Corporate governanceExcellenceMultidisciplinary approachColonialismCommissionEthnocentrism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion in EuropeThe Imiscoe Research Network unites researchers from some 30 istitutes specialising in studies of international migration, integration and social cohesion in Europe.What began in 2004 as a Network of Excellence sponsored by the Sixth Framework Programme of the European Commission became, as of April 2009, an independent self-funding endeavour.Imiscoe promotes integrated, multidisciplinary and globally comparative research led by scholars from various branches of the economic and social sciences, the humanities and law.The network furthers existing studies and pioneers new scholarship on migration and migrant integration.Encouraging innovative lines of inquiry key to European policymaking and governance is also a priority.The Imiscoe-Amsterdam University Press Series makes the network's findings and results available to researchers, policymakers and practitioners, the media and other interested stakeholders.High-quality manuscripts are evaluated by external peer reviews and the Imiscoe Editorial Committee.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)Same topicGerman Colonialism and Identity StudiesFrench-language works237,207