MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017844898

Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.)

2013· article· en· W7017844898 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSCIndeks · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSilymarin and Mushroom Poisoning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThistleCirsium arvenseWeedPerennial plantWeed control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cirsium arvense is perennial broadleaf weed species, reproducing by seeds and creeping roots. It is one of the most feared weeds in all Serbia and as well as in many countries in Europe and in the world. The noxiousness of the C. arvense is due to its creeping root system, every piece of which can give rise to a new plant, and to the numerous seeds which are easily scattered by the wind and which have a great longevity. The leaves of C. arvense vary greatly in the amount of hairiness, degree of lobing and spininess. Canada thistle species has four varieties based on these variations. It is a common weed of small grain crops, row crops, vegetables, orchards, legumes, roadsides, neglected areas, meadows and pastures. It species high adopted on different environmental conditions (type of soil, nutritions, temperature, moisture) and high competitiveness in relation to many crops. Small patches of Canada thistle should be destroyed promptly by digging out the roots, or by covering with heavy mulch paper. In alfalfa and pastures persistant cutting with a scythe or hoe will gradually reduce the thistle. In many crops except cultivation control is possible with application of many herbicides (clopyralid, metsulfuron- methyl, tribenuron-methyl, etc.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSCIndeksSame topicSilymarin and Mushroom PoisoningFrench-language works237,207