Chemostratigraphy and structural framework for gold mineralization at the Goliath Deposit, Western Wabigoon Subprovince, Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Goliath deposit (32 Mt at 1.09 g/t Au and 3.42 g/t Ag) is one of the larger gold deposits within the western Wabigoon subprovince, 20 km east of Dryden, Ontario. The economic potential of the Goliath deposit makes it important to understand its geological setting to improve exploration models for such significant targets. Felsic volcanic sedimentary rocks (maximum age of ~ 2703 Ma) host the mineralization, were sericitized, and metamorphosed into the muscovite- sericite schist and biotite-muscovite schist. This package is enclosed within a similarly aged turbidite sequence (maximum age of ~2701 Ma). The mineralization consists of base metal sulphides with gold and silver hosted in As-rich pyrite and remobilized along pyrite fractures. The mineralization is likely pre-deformation as the regional compressional D1 deformation and transpressional D2 deformation reoriented the grade shells to be subparallel to the S1 foliation (075°/78°), and higher-grade shells subparallel to the intersection lineation of S1 and S2 fabric (52°/218°), and subparallel to the F1 fold axial plane (28°/81°). The Goliath gold deposit is thus interpreted to have formed in a synvolcanic, pre-orogenic environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".