Causes and Consequences of Widespread Genotypic Uniformity in the Invasive Aquatic Plant Butomus umbellatus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the last century, the aquatic plant Butomus umbellatus has escaped its native Eurasian range and invaded along the Canadian-US border. There appear to be two diploid genotypes invading North America and previous genetic analyses have found almost no genotypic variation within or among introduced populations. In these populations, plants produce both asexual clonal bulbils and numerous viable seed, however, there is no evidence that seed successfully establishes. First, I test the hypothesis that populations are genetically uniform, then I investigate the following two potential factors limiting sexual reproduction in the invasive range, (1) that a climatic mismatch between the native and introduced ranges is preventing seedling germination and (2) that widespread clonal reproduction renders sexual progeny highly inbred thereby inhibiting recruitment via inbreeding depression. I conducted self-fertilizations, within and between distinct genotype crosses, but none of the recombinant progeny differed in the proportion of viable seed produced, total dry mass or bulbil production. These results are consistent with the previous genetic data which suggests that populations are genetically uniform and that the two distinct genotypes are closely related. I germinated seed under 4 temperatures (20º, 25º, 30º, 35ºC) and analyzed climate data from the genotypes’ introduced and native ranges. Germination was highest at 30ºC and this matched temperatures from the native range, but was much warmer than what B. umbellatus experiences in North America. This suggests that a climatic mismatch between the native and introduced range could be limiting sexual reproduction among introduced diploid populations. Finally, I compared the performance between 15 clonal lineages and 30 recombinant lineages derived from within-genotype crosses under two water depths. All aspects of growth were greater in shallow than deep water and clonal plants outperformed recombinant progeny. It’s also possible that bigger and faster growing bulbils are outcompeting inbred seedlings, limiting sexual reproduction in the introduced range. Given the prodigious clonal reproduction exhibited by these genotypes and the apparent lack of recruitment via seed, it is critical that management efforts target bulbil production and focus on preventing any other diploids genotypes from escaping the horticulture industry and becoming naturalized in North America.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".