MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7017865815

Carbon Dynamics of Subtropical Wetland Communities in South Florida

2014· article· en· W7017865815 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport SystemsFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityOhio State UniversityTrent UniversitySouth Florida Water Management DistrictNational Science Foundation
KeywordsWetlandSubtropicsCarbon fibersCarbon fluxCarbon cycle
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emission and uptake of greenhouse gases and the production and transport of dissolved organic matter in different wetland plant communities are key wetland functions determining two important ecosystem services, climate regulation and nutrient cycling.The objective of this dissertation was to study the variation of methane emissions, carbon sequestration and exports of dissolved organic carbon in wetland plant communities of a subtropical climate in south Florida.and are of interest in the design of future wetlands to intercept runoff from agricultural zones in the region and remove nutrients from it.The species dominating the different treatments in the mesocosms were: Typha domingensis, Cladium jamaicense, Nymphaea sp., Nymphaea sp./Eleocharis sp., Najas sp./Chara sp. and Najas sp.. Nymphaea sp./Eleocharis sp. and Najas sp./Chara sp.treatments functioned as temporary sinks for DOC, but, otherwise, all treatments were net sources of dissolved organic carbon, suggesting the importance of autochthonous material from within the mesocosms in the export of carbon.A two-source carbon isotope mixing model was used to estimate the contribution from inflow water and biomass into the outflow's dissolved organic carbon in each treatment.Dissolved organic carbon from biomass was relatively higher in treatments with emergent and floating vegetation (20 -32 %) than in treatments containing submerged aquatic vegetation (<5 %).This suggests a faster turnover of the organic matter in treatments dominated by submerged aquatic vegetation and presumably a comparative lower contribution of dissolved organic nutrients exported to the outflow water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)→Same topicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology→French-language works237,207→