MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017880533

Characterizing the spatial and temporal dynamics of phytoplankton phenology in the British Columbia and Southeast Alaska coastal oceans using satellite ocean colour data

2022· dissertation· en· W7017880533 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenologyPhytoplanktonSpring bloomOcean colorBloomEcosystemAlgal bloomSatellite
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The coastal waters of British Columbia (B.C.) support diverse food webs and provide habitats for various species of Pacific salmon, which are of vital importance to the regional economy and for First Nations culture and subsistence. To effectively monitor marine environmental health of these regions and any changes thereof, it is necessary to employ ecological indicators to provide objective and quantitative metrics upon which to evaluate the state of the ecosystem and their response to environmental and climatic perturbation. Phytoplankton phenology is an important ecological indicator that characterises the timing of annually occurring phytoplankton growing periods and has been typically synthesized into a set of indices encompassing the timing, duration, and magnitude of bloom events. Observing changes in phytoplankton phenology in this region requires vast spatial coverage and short temporal frequencies, which is achieved through ocean colour satellite imagery. Here, we evaluate the performance of the merged multi-sensor ocean colour chlorophyll-a products, GlobColour and OC-CCI, in the British Columbia coastal waters via a statistical match-up analysis and a qualitative analysis to determine whether the data reflects the region's large-scale seasonal trends and latitudinal dynamics. Using the chlorophyll-a product that is best suited to our purpose, we then derive a suite of phenological indices on a pixel-by-pixel basis, which is used to partition the study area into phenological bioregions using an objective, unsupervised partition strategy (Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering method). The delineated bioregions are then used to describe region-specific phytoplankton phenological patterns associated with bloom magnitude, frequency, duration, and timing. The interannual variability of spring bloom initiation was evaluated considering interactions with environmental variables, sea surface temperature anomaly and the El Nino Southern Oscillation index. The GlobColour interpolated chlorophyll-a product revealed sound statistical results (r2 = 0.63, slope = 0.88, bias = 0.81, MdAD = 1.69, RMSE = 0.37, n = 797) and demonstrated the expected seasonal and local dynamics for this region, and average concentrations within ranges reported for satellite-derived observations. The derived phenology indices showed longitudinal gradients. From east to west, bloom initiation along the coast was observed in spring, gradually progressing to fall dominated blooms further offshore, with peak chlorophyll concentrations of 38.5mg.m-3 and 3mg.m-3, respectively. The spatial patterns of number of blooms per pixel has shown to be inversely correlated to average bloom duration, with lower number of blooms having longer durations and vice versa. Four coherent bioregions were identified over the study region with distinctive phytoplankton phenological properties: two coastal regions, one shelf region and an offshore region. We found that early spring blooms were associated with a positive SST anomaly and El Nino conditions. Conversely, average or late spring blooms occurred in years where there was a negative SST anomaly and La Nina conditions. Furthermore, the relationship between spring bloom initiation and principal bloom initiation was evaluated, and we found that when there is a later spring bloom initiation we can expect a later principal bloom initiation, and vice versa. The findings of this study can help better inform fisheries management and conservation programs, by being able to infer the timing of spring bloom initiation in relation to SST anomalies and ENSO index.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)Same topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207