MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017922583

1920 Chap. 0195 An Act relative to the city council of the city of quincy.

2010· other· en· W7017922583 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueState Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts) · 2010
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommonwealthGovernment (linguistics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Legislation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The time within which the special commission, appointed ^jj^l^'^'j.^iunder the provisions of chapter two hundred and twentycommission to three of the General Acts of nineteen hundred and nineteen, judicature of to investigate the judicature of the commonwealth is required SiTieTtt o file its final report is hereby extended to the first Wednes-Snded!day in January, nineteen hundred and twenty-one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.005
Open science0.0070.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueState Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)French-language works237,207