Capture Success Rates of the Western Yellow-breasted Chat in the South Okanagan Valley, British Columbia, from 2005 through 2007
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since 2001 Environment Canada has color-banded the endangered population of the Yellow-breasted Chat (lcteria virens auricollis) in the south Okanagan valley, British Columbia, as part of a study of habitat selection and reproduction.During 2005 to 2007, we kept detailed records of chats banded in the breeding territories in the south Okanagan valley and determined capture success rates between 19.4 and 52.9 chats per 100 nethours for the three years.These high capture rates can most likely be attributed to consistency in banding personnel, knowledge of study sites, territories, behavior of the species and, in some instances, location of the nest.We had mixed results with active mist netting.During 2005 and 2007, no chats were caught with active mist netting and males did not react to the male chat playback call.However, during 2006, 175 chats per 100 nethours were captured with active mist netting.Males had a higher capture rate before a nest was located, while females were more often caught after a nest was located and while chicks were in the nest.Oct. -Dec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".