MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7017971148

Comparative Analysis and Speciation of Sulfur K, L-edge X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

2024· dissertation· en· W7017971148 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Light Source
KeywordsSulfurSpectroscopyRefining (metallurgy)Absorption spectroscopyAbsorption (acoustics)Yield (engineering)Characterization (materials science)Infrared spectroscopy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sulfur plays a critical role in the evolution of many common biological aspects of life as a key component of protein and enzyme function. It also plays a significant role in the contemporary demand for energy resources in modern society, with associated industrial and commercial applications. Sulfur composes a complex variety of organic and inorganic compounds and are naturally occurring in many hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs and other mineral resources. These energy and mineral resources are critical for industrial and technological development. Some of these sulfur compounds may have critical impacts on materials used in the transportation and refining of hydrocarbon products. These compounds also impact steam generated power infrastructure such as those found in pressurized water reactors. The characterization of sulfur, which has a formal oxidation state ranging from -2 to +6, using K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy is particularly useful for determining oxidized species. There are, however, limitations on the ability to visually resolve spectra for reduced and mixed sulfur compounds using the K-edge that may be better resolved using the L-edge due in part to an increase in photon resolution and chemical sensitivity at lower energy. A qualitative and quantitative study was completed on a broad spectrum of model organic and inorganic Sulfur (S) compounds using high resolution (≤0.1 eV) S K, L-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS). All the recorded spectra for both K, L-edges were measured in fluorescence yield (TFY) and total electron yield (TEY) and only TEY were considered for the purpose of this study. A direct qualitative approach was used to directly compare the spectroscopic uniqueness and usefulness between the two absorption edges. While using S L-edge XAS may provide a more effective way to visually speciate some chemical forms of sulfur, a combined approach utilizing both Sulfur L, K-edge XAS provides a full spectrum solution to chemical speciation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence AnalysisFrench-language works237,207