MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7017973845

CHARACTERIZATION OF HALOPHILIC MICROORGANISMS AND SULFATE SALTS FROM THE HYPERSALINE LAKES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA; AN ASTROBIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

2009· article· en· W7017973845 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSulfateHalophileSalt (chemistry)Life on MarsMicroorganismExtremophileReflectivityInfrared microscopyConfocal laser scanning microscopy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on geological evidence at Meridian! Planum, the loss of liquid water on Mars would have produced magnesium sulfate rich brines. The Basque Lakes of British Columbia, Canada, are an excellent terrestrial analogue for this site, as they possess highly concentrated brines fed by ground water springs, abundant sulfate salts, and are inhabited by halophilic organisms. All Basque Lake salt samples analyzed with a modified protein assay were found to contain biomass, while confocal/light microscopy revealed both cells and diffuse organic material within fluid inclusions, and in void spaces between intergrown crystals. It is here shown that reflectance IR is capable of detecting biosignatures within a sulfate matrix, the most sensitive of which are the 1550 ± 20 cm'1, C-N, N-H, -COOH absorptions and the 1040 ±10 cm'1C-OH, C-N, PO43' bond features. Due to its sensitivity and non-destructive nature reflectance IR can be regarded as a valuable tool for astrobiological exploration, especially when paired with visualization techniques such as confocal and light microscopy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicPlanetary Science and Exploration→French-language works237,207→