Changes in sensitivity of Sclerotinia homoeocarpa to the demethylation inhibitor fungicide propiconazole
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Samples of 'Sclerotinia homoeocarpa' were collected from the same locations sampled in a 1994 baseline fungicide sensitivity study, plus two other locations in southern Ontario. At least 50 isolates from each site were tested for propiconazole sensitivity by growing them on propiconazole-amended media and calculating EC50 values. The DMI-treated populations were significantly less sensitive than the baseline populations as well as the untreated populations. To test for cross sensitivity between DMI and other fungicides, 70 isolates were plated on discriminatory concentrations of 1 [mu]g/ml iprodione or 1 [mu]g/ml benomyl. No significant correlation was found between sensitivity toward propiconazole and benomyl. A weak correlation was found between DMI and iprodione sensitivity. All isolates were plated with vegetative compatibility group (VCG) tester isolates to see whether the less sensitive isolates were of the same origin. No correlation was found between VCG and propiconazole sensitivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".