Cooperative Fisheries Management in Canada's Western Arctic
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
"The Fisheries Joint Management Committee (FJMC) was established in 1986 as a result of the settlement of the Inuvialuit land claim in the Western Canadian Arctic. The FJMC consists of two Inuvialuit representatives, two government appointees and a committee-elected chairperson. The Committee has five main areas of responsibility: to exchange information and formulate advice to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans on activities and policies that affect regional fisheries; to recommend subsistence quotas and regulatory amendments to the Minister; to collect harvest information; to allocate subsistence quotas among communities; and to maintain a public registration system and, if necessary, to regulate public access for fishing in the region. In discharging these responsibilities, the FJMC funds research and assessment projects, holds community meetings and works closely with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. The evolution and success of cooperative fishery management through the FJMC are discussed."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it