MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7018025695

Community social services study: addressing recruitment and retention with residential care workers in British Columbia.

2008· dissertation· en· W7018025695 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2008
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionGestational periodHyporeflexiaTSG101Fusible alloyDemotionDiafiltrationProteogenomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Residential care workers are facing recruitment and retention challenges across British Columbia (BC). This study identifies inadequate work conditions and their contribution to labour force participation and turnover. The methodology for this project includes interviews with residential care workers, advocates, agencies, family members and BCGEU representatives. Findings show low wages an d under-qualified staff to be deterrents for recruitment and retention. The research suggests that community social service stakeholders can work collaboratively to improve the current situation. Based on the research findings, I recommend that BC adopt the following options: an anti-stigma campaign, professional development and a negotiated contract to include a wage increase, casual employee benefits and a flexible work schedule. The scope of this study is limited relative to the global labour shortage trend, and therefore, further research in other provinces is encouraged to augment our understanding of recruitment and retention issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)→Same topicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes→French-language works237,207→