Collegiality and the digitalized cage: advancing theory on multilevel leadership
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic and accompanying surge in remote working has brought discussion of digitalization and artificial intelligence (AI) to the fore. However, what is notable in the leadership literature is the extent to which disruption of collegial interactions and dysfunctional leader-follower relationship consequences of digitalization at the organizational level have been largely neglected. By visiting theories of multilevel leadership, collegiality, and social exchange theory, this conceptual paper seeks to rectify the omission of a focus on multilevel leadership and collegial hubs in complex organizations. It develops a nuanced framework that explores in some detail potential changes in collegial and leader-follower interactions and relationships, relational scaffolding, resource dependence, and employment domains. The twin objective is to understand the dynamics and to identify the extent to which digitalization and AI will shape them. <br/><br/>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it