Chiesa della Purissima Concezione Cagliari
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The essay presents the restoration works carried out at the chiesa della Purissima ( church of the Immaculate Conception) located in Cagliari in the quarter of Castello. The church and the adjoining convent were built in the Sixteenth century, since then they have had a very important role in the religious and civic life of Castello, the stronghold center of the city. The church was acquired by the Italian State in 1867, its conditions were critical and degradation proceeded throughout the Twentieth century, when several partial restorations works were carried out, never solving the totality of the serious conservations problems concerning walls, vaults, roofing, floors, altars, artwork and furnishings. Therefore, starting from 1950, the church had to be closed to the cult. In 2007 the church was declared of cultural, historical and artistic interest, according to the law about the national heritage, the “Codice Urbani”. In 2009 the City of Cagliari with its technical staff conducted an overall campaign concerning the architectural restoration of the whole monument: façade, vaults, walls, sculptured details, marble and slate floor, windows and main door. At the same time the Soprintendenza of Cagliari and Oristano carried out the restoration of the XVIII C. altars and the other works of art housed in the church, as the beautiful paintings and sculptures dating from the XVI C. Works were concluded in 2012.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".