MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018136674

Condiciones turísticas de la provincia de Tocache departamento de San Martin para la práctica de actividades de Turismo de Aventura.

2019· dissertation· es· W7018136674 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2019
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFinance, Taxation, and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaTourismNature tourism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente trabajo de investigación está basado en dar a conocer las condiciones turísticas para la práctica de las actividades del turismo de aventura en la provincia de Tocache departamento de San Martin. Los resultados demuestran que existen nueve recursos turísticos, destacándose Catarata Velo de Novia, cascada María la fantástica, cascada María de los Perfiles, Cascada de La Ninfa ,catarata San Juan De Ishanga, Cueva Milagrosa, Cueva Misteriosa, cueva del Ángel y el rio Chontayacu; que cuentan con rutas de acceso caracterizado por una carretera afirmada, asfaltada, trocha carrozable y caminos de herradura, medios de a caballo, camionetas, automóviles, bicicleta y motos lineales, entorno paisajístico y prinandole seguridad y tranquilidad al turista visitante. 
\nLa planta turística que cuenta y a la comunidad receptora son elementos positivos de la provincia de estudio ya que cuenta con una planta turística limitada pero al mismo tiempo cubre las necesidades básicas de los turistas y visitantes, contando con una comunidad receptora colaboradora y participativa en el turismo. 
\nSe utilizó métodos como: etnográfico, analítico-sintético: ayudó al análisis de la información recopilada en campo; técnicas como: observación directa siendo empleada en la etapa de campo, encuesta: realizada a un porcentaje de la comunidad, fichaje: esta técnica ayudó a sistematizar la información tomando en cuenta; instrumentos como: ficha de observación, cuestionario de encuesta y cámara fotográfica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it