MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018145129

De la penuria a la opulencia: las finanzas del Concejo de Huéscar en la primera mitad del XVI

2005· article· en· W7018145129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval and Early Modern Iberia
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal estateFeudalismLegislationQuarter (Canadian coin)EstateProperty (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The town council archival data in Huéscar about its real estate let us elucidate how the property came from poverty to opulence between the end of the 15`h century and the middle of the 16`h. In this evolution, we can distinguish three steps. The first, dates the first quarter of the 16`h century, characterised for the inadequacy of goods to face the expenses of the council and the press of the feudal sirs as well (firstly the «condestable» of Navarra and later the duke of Alba) to get a better income. The second (1526-36) called legislation period, gives the basis of a reorganized property making a wide local regulations. The third (1537-50), the town reaches to organize the business of its real assets in a coherent way, enjoying rearranged goods which give surplus in most of the events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.898
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it