A complexidade do lugar turístico em Fortaleza: uma análise do bairro Praia de Iracema
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study has the objective of analyzing some geographic aspects of Fortaleza city tourist spaces. The reference space is Praia de Iracema, chosen for its prominence in the tourist context of the indicated city. The study took as temporal interval from 1980 to 2007. This is the period in which the tourism activity gained prominence in the state of Ceará economy. The work was carried through observations, bibliographical materials review, and interviews. These procedures made possible the comprehension of the tourist variables that are pertinent to the quarter of Praia de Iracema. The research demonstrated that the understanding of the social and space aspects of the quarter goes beyond the understanding of the locality and that it involves temporal and space questions. The “magnificent” landscape that it is propagated by the promoters of the tourism is embedded of elements that get mixed in space terms and get separated in the social level. It was understood that the problems that took place in the study locality is fruit of a global process that reaches the most diverse parts of the planet. However, it is presented with particularities due to the specificity of such localities and that, in the quarter in of the study, these are well delineated particularities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it