MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018195588

Consulting report Team 2- MASEDI Contratistas Generales

2020· dissertation· en· W7018195588 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Victoria
KeywordsReputationQuality (philosophy)Order (exchange)Service (business)Marketing planPlan (archaeology)Social mediaDigital marketingPersonalizationSocial responsibility
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MASEDI is a Peruvian construction company created and founded by Vladimir Sokolic in 1999. They provide services in the field of architectural design, construction, maintenance and everything related to the area. Its approach as a company is based on leadership, experience, quality and personalized service in each project. The main problem identified is the low brand awareness which prevents from obtaining a greater number of clients in the private sector. This is mainly due to the strong competition, lack of a marketing department to promote the brand, as well as the reliance on word of mouth advertising thanks to its good reputation in the public sector. In that sense, the CEO is interested in finding strategies to make MASEDI recognized in the private sector for its quality service and expertise. The theory reviewed to develop the solution to the problem suggests marketing strategies through social media and content management; customer relationship management (CRM); and corporate social responsibility activities (CSR). Then, four alternatives were developed and evaluated regarding to cost, feasibility, effectiveness, ease of implementation and reliability. The final proposal includes an integrated marketing communication strategy through digital and nondigital media, as well as the division of the client portfolio, whose implementation plan is detailed step by step for MASEDI, in order to obtain new clients, get brand recognition and increased traffic on the web and social networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3590.163

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207