MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7018200276

Controls on organic matter preservation and distribution, Upper Cretaceous Colorado Group

2023· article· en· W7018200276 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithologyStructural basinCretaceousSedimentary depositional environmentSedimentary rockForeland basinMarine transgressionContext (archaeology)Tectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inconsistencies in production performance in self-sourcing, tight oil reservoirs have been related to lithologic heterogeneities. Applying traditional methods to characterize and model tight-oil petroleum systems presents a challenge as there is an assumption that organic-rich mudstone units are homogeneous with minimal stratal discontinuities. Relating depositional processes that promote organic matter preservation to stratal packaging in a basin evolution context provides the basis for predicting stratigraphic and geographic limits of discrete self-sourcing shale reservoirs. This study uses the regionally extensive organic-rich Blackstone Alloformation, comprising the Fish Scales, Belle Fourche, and Second White Speck formations of the Western Canada Foreland Basin, as a test case to examine the complex relationships between sedimentary facies, basin evolution, and organic matter preservation, with the purpose to determine if organic matter distribution can be predicted by extrapolating sedimentary lithofacies to basin scale.\nCorrelation of thirteen regionally traceable allostratigraphic surfaces across Alberta and Saskatchewan, covering majority of the Western Interior Seaway, define the Blackstone Alloformation. The resulting framework features tabular- and sheet-like stratigraphic geometries that provide evidence for active tectonic loading in the fold and thrust belt and tectonic quiescence on the stable craton, and the distal basin setting. Minor, isolated thinning and thickening of allomembers indicates that differential subsidence occurred as a response of basement structures to the shifting locations of depocentres. Five primary lithofacies are identified in core and correspond to four lithology categories used for percent lithology mapping: silty argillaceous mudstone, calcareous mudstone, heterolithic sandstone and mudstone, and sandstone. Percent lithology distribution maps show that the Greenhorn marine transgression led to the basinwide deposition of calcareous mudstone and that minor fluctuations in relative sea level from tectonic uplift or eustatic sea level fall meant sedimentation on the low gradient ramp was prone to the reworking of material on the sea floor by storm waves.\nProgrammed pyrolysis data reveals that the Blackstone Alloformation strata is rich in type II and type II-III kerogen and has high hydrocarbon generation potential. Calcareous mudstone and silty argillaceous mudstone contain the highest wt.% TOC (total organic carbon), followed by heterolithic sandstone and mudstone. Integration of TOC with upscaled sedimentary lithofacies/lithology mapping at the allomember scale confirms that lateral and vertical variations of organic matter preservation and distribution are controlled by factors contributing to the transport and deposition of fine-grained sediments. Enhanced organic matter preservation corresponds to depositional conditions that favour the development of organo-mineralic aggregates and limit organic matter dilution from siliciclastic sediment input or high carbonate production rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.421
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances→French-language works237,207→